qualityInstruction following88/100
Prompt follows the target scene, count constraints, and object relationships.
Review notesDerived from current single-html gallery sample
Visual review as a portable evidence pack
Use this option when the report needs image-first scanning plus source-backed detail. The packaged page keeps every figure, rubric note, and review comment available from a single file.
qualityText rendering84/100
Checks whether generated text remains legible and faithful to the prompt.
Review notes
qualityStyle transfer80/100
Compares requested design language with visible output traits.
Review notes
governanceSafety refusals76/100
Captures model limits and refusal behaviour for risky visual prompts.
Review notes
governancePrompt provenance72/100
Keeps prompt, seed, model, source path, and reviewer notes close to the figure.
Review notes
limitsRubric scoring68/100
Shows how inspection criteria translate into a repeatable review record.
Review notesInstruction following
Category: quality. Score: 88/100.
Prompt follows the target scene, count constraints, and object relationships.
Implementation pattern: keep prompt text, source file path, generation settings, and evaluator comments in this detail section, not in a detached text download.
Back to figureText rendering
Category: quality. Score: 84/100.
Checks whether generated text remains legible and faithful to the prompt.
Implementation pattern: keep prompt text, source file path, generation settings, and evaluator comments in this detail section, not in a detached text download.
Back to figureStyle transfer
Category: quality. Score: 80/100.
Compares requested design language with visible output traits.
Implementation pattern: keep prompt text, source file path, generation settings, and evaluator comments in this detail section, not in a detached text download.
Back to figureSafety refusals
Category: governance. Score: 76/100.
Captures model limits and refusal behaviour for risky visual prompts.
Implementation pattern: keep prompt text, source file path, generation settings, and evaluator comments in this detail section, not in a detached text download.
Back to figurePrompt provenance
Category: governance. Score: 72/100.
Keeps prompt, seed, model, source path, and reviewer notes close to the figure.
Implementation pattern: keep prompt text, source file path, generation settings, and evaluator comments in this detail section, not in a detached text download.
Back to figureRubric scoring
Category: limits. Score: 68/100.
Shows how inspection criteria translate into a repeatable review record.
Implementation pattern: keep prompt text, source file path, generation settings, and evaluator comments in this detail section, not in a detached text download.
Back to figureRubric
Score visual examples against instruction following, legibility, source traceability, risk handling, and evidence value. CSV export is acceptable when the table must be reused elsewhere, but the readable rubric belongs in the HTML.
Source and provenance
Every source prompt, reviewer note, and local text artifact should be rendered inside this page. Only binary or tabular artifacts that need separate distribution should be materialized as downloads.